Contradiction with Matthew 19:9
This verse allows for divorce in the case of fornication, seemingly providing an exception that Mark 10:11 does not mention, which strictly prohibits divorce and remarriage.
Matthew 19:9: And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except [it be] for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:1-2
This passage allows a man to write a bill of divorcement and send his wife away if he finds some uncleanness in her, contrary to the prohibition implied in Mark 10:11.
Deuteronomy 24:1-2: When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give [it] in her hand, and send her out of his house. [some...: Heb. matter of nakedness] [divorcement: Heb. cutting off]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:15
This verse suggests that if an unbelieving partner departs, the believer is not bound in such circumstances, implying a situation where separation is permissible, differing from Mark 10:11's stance on divorce.
1 Corinthians 7:15: But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such [cases]: but God hath called us to peace. [to peace: Gr. in peace]
Paradox #1
Mark 10:11 might seem to contradict other parts of the Bible that discuss divorce. While this verse has a strict stance on divorce and remarriage, other passages, like in Matthew 5:32 and 1 Corinthians 7:15, provide different conditions or exceptions for divorce. These differing perspectives can seem inconsistent regarding when divorce is acceptable according to Christian teachings.
Paradox #2
Mark 10:11 might be seen as conflicting with other passages in the Bible that address divorce and remarriage. For example, in Matthew 19:9, Jesus provides an exception for divorce in the case of marital unfaithfulness, whereas Mark 10:11 does not mention any exceptions. This difference might lead some to see a contradiction in how strictly divorce and remarriage are addressed.
Paradox #3
Mark 10:11 might be seen as inconsistent or in conflict with historical practices because divorce and remarriage were common and accepted in many ancient societies, including among Jewish communities. The verse's stance could contradict these practices, emphasizing stricter moral standards than what was culturally or socially accepted at the time.
Paradox #4
Mark 10:11 discusses the topic of divorce and adultery. A potential contradiction or conflict could arise because the verse presents a strict view on divorce that might seem at odds with more compassionate approaches to personal relationships. Some people might find it challenging to reconcile the verse's strictness with situations involving personal well-being, abuse, or irreconcilable differences in a marriage, where divorce might be seen as a necessary or compassionate choice.