Contradiction with Luke 12:33
This verse advises to sell possessions and give alms, which aligns more with Mark 10:21 than contradicts, lacking a contradiction about wealth.
Luke 12:33: Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:17
Advises the rich not to trust in wealth but to trust in God, potentially contradicting the idea of relinquishing riches entirely.
1 Timothy 6:17: Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; [uncertain...: Gr. uncertainty of riches]
Contradiction with Proverbs 10:22
Suggests that the blessing of the Lord makes rich, which might seem inconsistent with the idea that wealth should be given up.
Proverbs 10:22: The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow with it.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 5:19
States that wealth is a gift from God and should be enjoyed, contrasting with the call to sell all possessions.
Ecclesiastes 5:19: Every man also to whom God hath given riches and wealth, and hath given him power to eat thereof, and to take his portion, and to rejoice in his labour; this [is] the gift of God.
Contradiction with Genesis 13:2
Mentions Abram was very rich, implying wealth itself isn't negative, conflicting with the directive to dispose of it for spiritual gain in Mark 10:21.
Genesis 13:2: And Abram [was] very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Mark 10:21 could be its challenge to the idea of wealth being a sign of God's favor, as other parts of the Bible, particularly in the Old Testament, often associate material blessings with being righteous and favored by God. This verse suggests that wealth can be a hindrance to spiritual growth, which might seem inconsistent with those other passages.
Paradox #2
Mark 10:21 could be seen as conflicting with the idea that salvation is by faith alone, without requiring specific actions. Some interpret this verse as implying that a specific action (like selling possessions) is necessary for eternal life, which might seem inconsistent with teachings on faith being the sole requirement. However, many argue it highlights the importance of not being overly attached to worldly possessions rather than contradicting the core doctrine of faith.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Mark 10:21 could be seen in how it suggests selling all possessions to help the poor, which may conflict with how some people, including religious communities or leaders, live in wealth or maintain possessions. This could be seen as inconsistent with the idea of giving up everything for spiritual gain or aiding those in need.