Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Encourages turning the other cheek instead of responding with violence, contrasting with Jesus driving out the merchants in Mark 11:15.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Advises against repaying evil for evil, conflicting with the act of driving out merchants with force.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27-29
Urges love for enemies and non-violence, contrasting with the forceful actions in Mark 11:15.
Luke 6:27-29: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Advises against retaliation, differing from Jesus' actions in cleansing the temple.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Suggests that those who draw the sword shall perish by it, conflicting with the aggressive action described.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Paradox #1
Mark 11:15 describes Jesus clearing out the temple, driving out those buying and selling. Some may see a contradiction when comparing this with teachings of love, patience, and tolerance. It could seem inconsistent that Jesus, who often preached peace, reacted with anger and force. However, many interpret this action as a demonstration of righteous anger against corruption and exploitation, not a contradiction of his teachings.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Mark 11:15 might be seen in the way Jesus, who often taught about peace and forgiveness, is depicted using force to drive out people from the temple. This action could seem inconsistent with his teachings on love and non-violence.