Contradiction with Matthew 17:24-27
This passage suggests exemption from paying tribute money, whereas Mark 12:14 discusses the obligation to pay tribute.
Matthew 17:24-27: And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute [money] came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? [tribute: called in the original, didrachma, being in value fifteen pence sterling; about thirty seven cents]
Contradiction with Acts 5:29
This verse states that we ought to obey God rather than men, potentially contradicting the submission to earthly authorities implied in Mark 12:14.
Acts 5:29: Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Contradiction with Hosea 8:4
Describes a situation where rulers are set up without God's approval, contradicting the implication in Mark 12:14 that authorities are legitimate and deserving of payment.
Hosea 8:4: They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew [it] not: of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, that they may be cut off.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:3
Commands no other gods before God, which can be seen as a contradiction to giving Caesar what is interpreted as due to God in Mark 12:14.
Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict related to the verse could revolve around the political and social tensions between the Jewish population and the Roman authorities at the time. The challenge presented in the verse involves the question of paying taxes to the Roman Empire, which was a contentious issue. Many Jews resented Roman rule and the taxes imposed on them, leading to debates on whether it was acceptable or lawful under Jewish law to pay such taxes. This reflects the broader struggle and conflict between maintaining religious identity and complying with occupying powers.
Paradox #2
The potential moral conflict in Mark 12:14 could be about the tension between civic duties and religious obligations. The verse addresses whether it's right to pay taxes to a ruling authority, which can conflict with one's spiritual beliefs and loyalties. This raises questions about balancing earthly obligations and spiritual commitments.