Contradiction with Matthew 22:30
This verse seems to confirm Mark 12:25 rather than contradict it, but it's important to examine the context closely.
Matthew 22:30: But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,
Contradiction with Genesis 2:24
This verse suggests the institution of marriage as a lasting union, potentially challenging the notion of no marital relationships after resurrection.
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:39
Implies the continuation of the marriage bond, at least in the context of earthly life, potentially conflicting with the idea of no marriage after resurrection.
1 Corinthians 7:39: The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
Contradiction with Romans 7:2
Indicates the binding nature of marriage as long as both partners live, suggesting continuity of the marital relationship.
Romans 7:2: For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to [her] husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of [her] husband.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:31-32
Speaks of marriage as a profound mystery reflecting Christ and the church, opening a discussion on its eternal significance.
Ephesians 5:31-32: For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with Revelation 19:7-9
This passage describes a marriage supper of the Lamb, potentially suggesting a form of marriage in the heavenly realm.
Revelation 19:7-9: Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
Paradox #1
Mark 12:25 suggests that people will not marry in heaven, which may seem to contradict teachings that emphasize the importance and eternal nature of marriage. Some believe that marriage is a sacred, everlasting bond, but this verse suggests a different view of relationships in the afterlife.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction with the idea of eternal marriage found in some religious beliefs. In Mark 12:25, it suggests a different view about the state of marriage after resurrection, which might conflict with teachings that emphasize marriage continuing eternally in heaven.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction or inconsistency is the idea of marriage and relationships in the afterlife. Some people might find it difficult to reconcile the idea of strong, lifelong commitments made on Earth, like marriage, with the notion that these do not carry over into the afterlife. This could be seen as inconsistent with the value placed on marriage and family relationships in many religious teachings.