Contradiction with Luke 22:3-4
While Mark 14:11 mentions Judas's willingness to betray Jesus for money, Luke 22:3-4 attributes this act to Satan entering into Judas, suggesting his actions were beyond just monetary motives.
Luke 22:3-4: Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve.
Contradiction with John 12:6
Mark 14:11 focuses on Judas's agreement to betray Jesus for money, while John 12:6 describes Judas as a thief who cared not for the poor, implying broader corrupt motives beyond a single bribe.
John 12:6: This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
Contradiction with Matthew 27:3-4
Mark 14:11 shows Judas's willingness to betray Jesus for money, but in Matthew 27:3-4, Judas shows remorse and returns the money, suggesting a conflict of intentions later on.
Matthew 27:3-4: Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders,
Contradiction with Acts 1:18
Mark 14:11 portrays Judas as eager to receive money for betrayal, while Acts 1:18 describes the outcome of Judas's actions leading to his death, an unintended result not foreseen in Mark.
Acts 1:18: Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Mark 14:11 could be seen in the act of betrayal for personal gain. It highlights a conflict between loyalty and self-interest, as someone might struggle with the moral implications of betraying a friend for money. This raises questions about the values of trust, loyalty, and the corrupting influence of greed.