Contradiction with Hebrews 9:22
It suggests that almost all things are purified with blood, yet forgiveness without the shedding of blood is impossible, which contrasts with the singular efficacy implied in Mark 14:24.
Hebrews 9:22: And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:29
Here, Jesus speaks of not drinking wine again until He drinks it new in His Father's kingdom, which suggests a future event, contrasting with the immediacy of the blood covenant in Mark 14:24.
Matthew 26:29: But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 11:25
This verse speaks of the cup as the new testament in Jesus’ blood, emphasizing remembrance rather than the present covenant actuality, which could contrast Mark 14:24’s emphasis on the covenant made at that time.
1 Corinthians 11:25: After the same manner also [he took] the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink [it], in remembrance of me.
Contradiction with John 6:53-56
These verses emphasize the necessity of spiritually feeding on Jesus for life, possibly contradicting the singular act of covenant mentioned in Mark 14:24.
John 6:53-56: Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Contradiction with Luke 22:20
Similar to 1 Corinthians 11:25, it talks about the new testament in his blood but places emphasis on remembrance, which might contrast with the active covenant-making in Mark 14:24.
Luke 22:20: Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup [is] the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
Paradox #1
Mark 14:24 might be seen as contradictory when compared to other biblical passages concerning the nature of Jesus' sacrifice and the concept of covenant. In particular, some interpret it to suggest a new covenant through Jesus' blood, distinct from the old covenant given to Israel through the law of Moses. This can lead to confusion or debate about whether the old covenant is replaced or fulfilled and how it aligns with passages in Hebrews and other epistles that discuss covenants differently.
Paradox #2
Mark 14:24 might raise questions about translation differences and how different Christian denominations interpret the concept of the "new covenant." Some might see conflicts between this verse and other parts of the Bible regarding the nature of covenants and Jesus' role. Additionally, there could be historical debates on whether this account aligns perfectly with other Gospel accounts of the Last Supper.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Mark 14:24 could relate to the idea of sacrifice and forgiveness. Some might see a conflict between the concept of needing a blood sacrifice to forgive sins and the belief in a loving and forgiving deity. This could be seen as inconsistent with the idea of unconditional love and forgiveness.