Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Teaches not to resist evil and turn the other cheek, contradicting the act of violence in Mark 14:47.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
States that those who take up the sword will perish by the sword, opposing the use of a sword in Mark 14:47.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Instructs not to repay evil for evil, contrasting with the retaliatory action seen in Mark 14:47.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Advises not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult, in opposition to the retaliation in Mark 14:47.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
The potential inconsistency with Mark 14:47 lies in differing accounts of the event in the Gospels. While Mark describes someone cutting off a servant's ear during Jesus' arrest, the Gospel of John identifies this person as Peter. Additionally, John's account specifically names the servant as Malchus. This variation in details can be seen as a contradiction among the Gospel narratives.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in Mark 14:47 might arise from the act of violence depicted in the verse. On one hand, the Bible promotes love, forgiveness, and turning the other cheek, while on the other hand, this verse shows a disciple using violence. This might seem inconsistent with the teachings of peace and non-violence found elsewhere in the Bible.