Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises to resist not evil and turn the other cheek, contradicting the violence implied in Mark 15:15, where Jesus is scourged.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 17:15
This verse condemns justifying the wicked and condemning the just, contrary to Pilate's decision in Mark 15:15.
Proverbs 17:15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both [are] abomination to the LORD.
Contradiction with Exodus 23:7
This verse warns against killing the innocent and righteous, which contrasts with Mark 15:15, where Jesus is punished despite being innocent.
Exodus 23:7: Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.
Contradiction with Isaiah 53:9
This verse speaks of no violence being done, which contradicts the action of scourging in Mark 15:15.
Isaiah 53:9: And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither [was any] deceit in his mouth. [death: Heb. deaths]
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
This verse advises against rendering evil for evil, whereas Mark 15:15 involves Jesus being treated unlawfully.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Proverbs 18:5
This verse warns against showing partiality to the wicked, contrasting with Pilate's action in Mark 15:15.
Proverbs 18:5: [It is] not good to accept the person of the wicked, to overthrow the righteous in judgment.
Paradox #1
The verse "Mark 15:15" might raise questions about justice and morality. It describes a situation where a decision is made for political reasons rather than fairness. This could conflict with the broader biblical themes of justice and righteousness.
Paradox #2
Mark 15:15 could present a contradiction because it involves an authority figure making a decision to satisfy the crowd, rather than acting on principles of justice or truth. The decision led to an innocent person suffering harm. This can be seen as conflicting with moral ideals that emphasize fairness and the protection of innocent people.