Contradiction with Philippians 2:12
This verse emphasizes working out your own salvation, which can be interpreted as focusing on personal righteousness unlike Mark 2:17 which suggests Jesus came for sinners needing repentance.
Philippians 2:12: Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
Contradiction with Romans 3:23
States that all have sinned, contrasting with Mark 2:17's focus on Jesus coming for the sinners, implying others are righteous.
Romans 3:23: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Contradiction with 1 John 3:6
Claims whoever abides in Christ does not sin, conflicting with Mark 2:17 which suggests Jesus called sinners to repentance.
1 John 3:6: Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
Contradiction with Matthew 9:13
Although similar, emphasizes learning mercy over sacrifice, contrasting with Mark 2:17's focus on calling sinners.
Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:26
Warns against deliberate sin after knowing truth, differing from Mark 2:17 where Jesus calls sinners.
Hebrews 10:26: For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Paradox #1
Mark 2:17 might present a contradiction in how religious communities have historically focused on maintaining strict rules and rituals, whereas this verse emphasizes helping those who are spiritually or morally "sick" rather than focusing on the "righteous." This could conflict with the practice of prioritizing religious laws over acts of compassion and inclusivity.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Mark 2:17 could be the idea that if Jesus came to help those who are "sick" or "sinners," it might seem to suggest that He is not there for the "righteous" or those who follow the rules. This could be seen as conflicting because it implies a focus on those needing help while possibly neglecting those who already live ethically. However, others interpret it as emphasizing that everyone, including the "righteous," ultimately needs guidance and healing.