Contradiction with Matthew 6:16
This verse implies that fasting is a personal discipline not tied to the presence of Jesus, whereas Mark 2:19 suggests fasting is inappropriate in His presence.
Matthew 6:16: Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:1-4
This passage teaches there is a time for everything, including fasting and feasting, which may not align directly with Jesus’ reasoning in Mark 2:19.
Ecclesiastes 3:1-4: To every [thing there is] a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:5
This advises fasting and prayer as important spiritual practices that seem unrelated to the presence of Jesus, contrary to the implication in Mark 2:19.
1 Corinthians 7:5: Defraud ye not one the other, except [it be] with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Contradiction with Isaiah 58:3-5
These verses emphasize the importance and purpose of fasting itself, regardless of any temporal or physical presence, which could contradict the context given in Mark 2:19.
Isaiah 58:3-5: Wherefore have we fasted, [say they], and thou seest not? [wherefore] have we afflicted our soul, and thou takest no knowledge? Behold, in the day of your fast ye find pleasure, and exact all your labours. [labours: or, things wherewith ye grieve others: Heb. griefs]
Paradox #1
Mark 2:19 could present a moral inconsistency because it suggests that there are times when traditional practices or rules, such as fasting, may not apply. This could conflict with the idea that religious rules should always be followed consistently.