Contradiction with Exodus 31:14
This verse emphasizes the strict observance of the Sabbath, stating that everyone who defiles it shall be put to death, contrasting with Mark 2:27 where the Sabbath is presented as a benefit to man, rather than a strict rule.
Exodus 31:14: Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it [is] holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth [any] work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
Contradiction with Numbers 15:32-36
This passage describes a man being put to death for gathering sticks on the Sabbath, highlighting the severity of sabbath laws, which contrasts with the leniency implied in Mark 2:27.
Numbers 15:32-36: And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:21-22
This passage warns against carrying burdens on the Sabbath, underscoring strict adherence to Sabbath prohibitions, which contrasts with the more human-centric view of the Sabbath in Mark 2:27.
Jeremiah 17:21-22: Thus saith the LORD; Take heed to yourselves, and bear no burden on the sabbath day, nor bring [it] in by the gates of Jerusalem;
Contradiction with Nehemiah 13:15-18
Here Nehemiah rebukes the people for working on the Sabbath and emphasizes strict observance, which contrasts with the idea in Mark 2:27 that the Sabbath is made for man's benefit.
Nehemiah 13:15-18: In those days saw I in Judah [some] treading wine presses on the sabbath, and bringing in sheaves, and lading asses; as also wine, grapes, and figs, and all [manner of] burdens, which they brought into Jerusalem on the sabbath day: and I testified [against them] in the day wherein they sold victuals.
Contradiction with Exodus 35:2
This verse mandates death for working on the Sabbath, contrasting with Mark 2:27's interpretation of the Sabbath as being made to serve human needs.
Exodus 35:2: Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whosoever doeth work therein shall be put to death. [an...: Heb. holiness]
Paradox #1
Mark 2:27 might seem to conflict with strict Sabbath laws from the Old Testament. In the Old Testament, Sabbath rules were very strict, but this verse suggests a focus on human need over strict rules. The contradiction is about how strictly laws should be followed versus prioritizing human well-being.
Paradox #2
Mark 2:27 could be seen as conflicting with strict interpretations of Sabbath laws in the Old Testament, which emphasize rest and prohibitions on work. Some might see a contradiction between the purpose of the Sabbath as a rigid rule and the interpretation of its intent for human benefit as suggested in this verse.
Paradox #3
Mark 2:27 speaks about the purpose of the Sabbath. Some see a contradiction between this teaching and the traditional Jewish laws, which have strict rules about observing the Sabbath. It can seem inconsistent because the verse emphasizes human need over strict observance, which might conflict with traditional interpretations of Sabbath laws.
Paradox #4
Mark 2:27 suggests that rules or laws should serve people's well-being rather than people being burdened by them. A potential contradiction could arise if this idea is contrasted with strict adherence to religious laws elsewhere in the Bible, where following rules might seem more important than individual needs. This could create a perceived inconsistency about whether laws exist to help people or if people are meant to strictly uphold laws regardless of personal impact.