Contradiction with Exodus 20:8-10
Mark 3:4 implies permission to do good on the Sabbath, while Exodus 20:8-10 commands rest and refraining from work on the Sabbath.
Exodus 20:8-10: Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
Contradiction with Exodus 31:14
Mark 3:4 suggests doing good on the Sabbath is permissible, whereas Exodus 31:14 declares that doing any work could result in death, emphasizing strict Sabbath observance.
Exodus 31:14: Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it [is] holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth [any] work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
Contradiction with Numbers 15:32-36
Mark 3:4 proposes it's lawful to do good on the Sabbath, but Numbers 15:32-36 describes a man being stoned for gathering sticks on the Sabbath, enforcing a strict prohibition on work.
Numbers 15:32-36: And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:12-14
Mark 3:4 questions the prohibition of doing good on the Sabbath, yet Deuteronomy 5:12-14 maintains the need for rest and refraining from work, reinforcing traditional Sabbath observance.
Deuteronomy 5:12-14: Keep the sabbath day to sanctify it, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:21-22
Mark 3:4 suggests leniency towards doing good on the Sabbath, while Jeremiah 17:21-22 strictly prohibits bearing burdens on the Sabbath to keep it holy.
Jeremiah 17:21-22: Thus saith the LORD; Take heed to yourselves, and bear no burden on the sabbath day, nor bring [it] in by the gates of Jerusalem;
Paradox #1
Mark 3:4 involves Jesus asking about the appropriateness of doing good deeds on the Sabbath. The contradiction or conflict could arise from differing interpretations of Sabbath laws. In Jewish tradition, strict observance of the Sabbath was commanded, prohibiting work. Jesus challenges this interpretation by suggesting that doing good and saving life should be prioritized over strict Sabbath observance. The conflict lies between traditional law enforcement and the more compassionate, flexible interpretation presented by Jesus.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in Mark 3:4 could involve the tension between following strict religious laws and the need to do good or help others. It raises questions about whether adhering to rules is more important than showing compassion and kindness, especially when someone is in need. This can create a dilemma between legalistic approaches and ethical actions that prioritize human well-being.