Contradiction with Exodus 20:12
This verse commands honoring one's father and mother, which opposes the idea of declaring something as Corban, potentially nullifying one's duty to their parents.
Exodus 20:12: Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:16
Similar to Exodus 20:12, it emphasizes honoring parents, contrasting with using Corban as an excuse not to support them.
Deuteronomy 5:16: Honour thy father and thy mother, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee; that thy days may be prolonged, and that it may go well with thee, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Contradiction with Ephesians 6:2
Reiterates the commandment to honor parents, which conflicts with the practice described in Mark 7:11.
Ephesians 6:2: Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment with promise;)
Contradiction with Proverbs 23:22
Advises listening to one's father and not despising one's mother, opposing neglect of them through Corban.
Proverbs 23:22: Hearken unto thy father that begat thee, and despise not thy mother when she is old.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:4
Emphasizes God's command to honor parents, directly challenging the tradition of declaring Corban as a loophole.
Matthew 15:4: For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
Paradox #1
Mark 7:11 might raise questions about prioritizing religious traditions over moral responsibilities. It highlights a situation where human-made rules could be used to avoid fulfilling obligations to family. This could conflict with biblical teachings about honoring and caring for parents.
Paradox #2
Mark 7:11 could be seen as having a doctrinal inconsistency with the command to "honor your father and mother" in the Ten Commandments. The verse addresses a practice (Corban) where people would declare their resources dedicated to God, thereby avoiding using them to support their parents. This contradicts the expectation of taking care of one's parents, as emphasized in biblical teachings.
Paradox #3
Mark 7:11 is sometimes seen as contradictory because it addresses the tradition of "Corban," where people would declare their possessions or money as dedicated to God, thus avoiding their responsibility to help their parents. This could conflict with the commandment to honor one's parents. The verse highlights the inconsistency between following religious traditions and adhering to moral responsibilities outlined in the commandments.
Paradox #4
Mark 7:11 highlights the conflict where people might use religious traditions as a loophole to avoid supporting their parents. This creates a contradiction because it goes against the core value of honoring and caring for one's parents, which is also emphasized in religious teachings. By prioritizing tradition over direct family care, it presents an inconsistency in upholding genuine moral duties.