Contradiction with Leviticus 11:7-8
These verses command not to eat swine, as it is unclean, contradicting Mark 7:19 which implies that all foods are clean.
Leviticus 11:7-8: And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he [is] unclean to you.
Contradiction with Isaiah 66:17
This verse speaks against eating unclean things such as swine's flesh, opposing the idea in Mark 7:19 that all foods are clean.
Isaiah 66:17: They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one [tree] in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD. [behind...: or, one after another]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 14:8
This verse reiterates that swine is unclean and should not be eaten, conflicting with Mark 7:19's implication that all foods are clean.
Deuteronomy 14:8: And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it [is] unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 4:14
This verse emphasizes that certain foods are defiled, which contradicts Mark 7:19's suggestion that all foods are clean.
Ezekiel 4:14: Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.
Contradiction with Acts 10:14
Peter's declaration that he has never eaten anything impure or unclean suggests a dietary restriction contrary to Mark 7:19’s declaration of all foods being clean.
Acts 10:14: But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17-18
These verses indicate that the law, including dietary laws, is not abolished, contradicting the implication in Mark 7:19 about clean foods.
Matthew 5:17-18: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Paradox #1
Mark 7:19 could be seen as a contradiction because it suggests that all foods are clean, which conflicts with Old Testament laws that label certain foods as unclean. This creates an inconsistency between the dietary laws in the Old Testament and the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament.
Paradox #2
Mark 7:19 might seem to contradict earlier Jewish dietary laws found in Leviticus 11, which outline specific rules about clean and unclean foods. This verse can be seen as suggesting that these food laws are no longer necessary, which might conflict with the Old Testament teachings where such dietary restrictions are commanded.
Paradox #3
Mark 7:19 is sometimes seen as contradicting Jewish dietary laws from the Old Testament, which distinguish between clean and unclean foods. This verse suggests that Jesus declared all foods clean, potentially conflicting with earlier scripture that outlines dietary restrictions for Jewish people.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Mark 7:19 could be related to the idea that food does not impact spiritual purity. From a scientific point of view, what we eat affects our physical health, and some might argue that it influences our mental and emotional well-being, which can be seen as part of one's spiritual state. Therefore, saying food has no impact at all could contradict the understanding that diet influences overall health and well-being.
Paradox #5
Mark 7:19 might present a contradiction for some because it suggests that all foods are clean. This could conflict with dietary laws found in other parts of the Bible that restrict certain foods. Some people may see this as inconsistent with previous teachings, while others view it as a new interpretation or understanding of dietary practices.