Contradiction with Matthew 12:30
This verse states, "He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad," suggesting a more exclusive stance than Mark 9:40.
Matthew 12:30: He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Contradiction with Luke 11:23
This verse echoes Matthew 12:30, expressing a similar sentiment of exclusivity, which contradicts the inclusive tone of Mark 9:40.
Luke 11:23: He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.
Paradox #1
Mark 9:40 can be seen as contradictory or inconsistent in relation to the idea of exclusivity in some religious practices. This verse suggests inclusivity, which might clash with other biblical passages emphasizing strict adherence to specific community or doctrinal boundaries. This could create tension for those interpreting scripture who prioritize exclusivity in faith communities.
Paradox #2
Mark 9:40 is sometimes seen as contradicting other biblical passages that emphasize separation from those not following Christ directly or maintaining specific beliefs. While Mark 9:40 suggests a more inclusive approach, other scriptures, like 2 Corinthians 6:14, advise against forming partnerships with non-believers. This can create a tension between inclusivity and exclusivity in Christian doctrine.
Paradox #3
Mark 9:40 suggests that anyone who is not against you is for you. A contradiction might arise when comparing this idea to the principle that actions, not just intentions or affiliations, determine one's moral standing. If someone does not actively help, their neutrality might still allow harm, leading to a conflict with the idea of moral responsibility.