Contradiction with Mark 6:9
While Matthew 10:10 advises not taking shoes, this verse specifically states they should wear sandals.
Mark 6:9: But [be] shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
Contradiction with Luke 22:36
Instead of taking nothing, this verse encourages acquiring supplies, like a sword, if necessary.
Luke 22:36: Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take [it], and likewise [his] scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:18
Contradicts the idea of taking no money, suggesting a laborer deserves compensation.
1 Timothy 5:18: For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer [is] worthy of his reward.
Paradox #1
One potential theological inconsistency might be the differing instructions about material possessions. In Matthew 10:10, Jesus advises his disciples not to carry certain items when they go on their mission, suggesting trust in God's provision. However, in other parts of the Bible, there are instructions or examples where provisions or preparations are made for a journey or task, such as in Luke 22:36 where Jesus tells his disciples to take a purse and a bag. This can seem inconsistent in the context of how and when to rely on divine provision versus personal responsibility.
Paradox #2
A potential moral conflict in Matthew 10:10 could be the instruction for simplicity and dependence on others, which might clash with modern values of self-reliance and preparation. This could create tension for followers who try to balance faith with practical concerns in daily life.