Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 9:5
This verse states that the dead know nothing, which contradicts the implication in Matthew 10:28 of the soul’s continued existence after the body is killed.
Ecclesiastes 9:5: For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
Contradiction with Psalm 146:4
This verse suggests that thoughts perish at death, opposing the idea in Matthew 10:28 that the soul can survive after physical death.
Psalm 146:4: His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
Contradiction with Job 14:10-12
These verses describe death as a state of inactivity until resurrection, contrasting with Matthew 10:28's notion of fearing the destruction of the soul after death.
Job 14:10-12: But man dieth, and wasteth away: yea, man giveth up the ghost, and where [is] he? [wasteth...: Heb. is weakened, or, cut off]
Contradiction with Isaiah 26:14
This verse implies that those who have died will not rise again, challenging the concept in Matthew 10:28 that the soul should be feared for possible destruction.
Isaiah 26:14: [They are] dead, they shall not live; [they are] deceased, they shall not rise: therefore hast thou visited and destroyed them, and made all their memory to perish.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:4
This verse states that the soul that sins shall die, contradicting Matthew 10:28’s implication that the soul can endure beyond physical death.
Ezekiel 18:4: Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:22
This verse suggests all will be made alive in Christ, which contrasts with the idea in Matthew 10:28 that the soul can be destroyed post-mortem.
1 Corinthians 15:22: For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
Paradox #1
The verse might be seen as conflicting with views that emphasize God's love and mercy, as it discusses fear and consequences after death, which some interpret as being less aligned with a purely loving and forgiving deity. This can create tension with interpretations focusing on God's grace and compassion.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction between Matthew 10:28 and the idea of a loving God, because the verse suggests that God has the power to destroy both body and soul, which can seem harsh or frightening. This could conflict with the belief in a gentle and forgiving God. However, others interpret it as a warning to prioritize spiritual well-being over physical fears, without necessarily contradicting God's loving nature.
Paradox #3
Some people find a contradiction in different parts of the Bible about what happens after death. Some verses suggest a final judgment, while others seem to suggest that the soul goes straight to heaven or hell. This can seem inconsistent to those studying these texts closely.
Paradox #4
The verse involves concepts of the soul and the afterlife, which are spiritual or metaphysical ideas. Science, which is based on empirical evidence and observation, does not address or engage with the existence of the soul or what happens after death in a way that matches religious interpretations. Therefore, any contradiction or inconsistency would stem from the inability of science to verify or study these spiritual claims.
Paradox #5
Some people might see a moral conflict in the idea that while life is precious and sacred, the verse emphasizes fearing spiritual consequences more than physical harm. This could seem inconsistent with a compassionate view on valuing life and well-being.