Contradiction with James 3:17
James 3:17 emphasizes peace and gentleness, contrasting with the notion of violent force that Matthew 11:12 may imply.
James 3:17: But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. [partiality: or, wrangling]
Contradiction with Romans 14:19
Romans 14:19 advocates for pursuing peace and mutual edification, contradicting the idea of taking the kingdom by force mentioned in Matthew 11:12.
Romans 14:19: Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
This verse states that God is not the author of confusion but of peace, which contradicts any interpretation of Matthew 11:12 suggesting chaotic force.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
This verse praises peacemakers as the children of God, conflicting with any interpretation of Matthew 11:12 that supports violent action.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:22
The verse lists the fruits of the Spirit, including peace and gentleness, contrasting with the violence implied in Matthew 11:12.
Galatians 5:22: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Contradiction with 2 Timothy 2:24
This verse highlights the importance of being gentle and patient, contradicting the use of violence in Matthew 11:12.
2 Timothy 2:24: And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all [men], apt to teach, patient, [patient: or, forbearing]
Contradiction with Hebrews 12:14
The call to pursue peace with all men contrasts with the idea of forceful actions suggested in Matthew 11:12.
Hebrews 12:14: Follow peace with all [men], and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
Paradox #1
Some people see a conflict in the verse's idea of violence related to the kingdom of heaven. Typically, the kingdom is associated with peace and love. This verse might be confusing because it seems to suggest aggression, which doesn't match with other teachings in the Bible about peace and non-violence.
Paradox #2
Some people think there might be a contradiction with Matthew 11:12 because it talks about the kingdom of heaven being taken by force. This seems to conflict with the idea that God's kingdom is a place of peace and love. The verse can be confusing because it sounds like something aggressive, while other parts of the Bible focus on peace and non-violence. However, interpretations suggest it may mean spiritual eagerness or struggle rather than physical force.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction or inconsistency might come from differing interpretations of what "violence" and "violent men" mean in the context of that time. Some scholars and readers might find it conflicting whether it refers to the physical or spiritual struggle of spreading the message, or how it correlates with the peaceful teachings elsewhere in the Bible. Understanding the cultural and historical meaning could lead to different interpretations.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction in Matthew 11:12 could relate to the idea of using force or conflict to achieve spiritual or divine goals. The verse suggests that there is a struggle or aggression involved in the coming of God's kingdom, which might seem at odds with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize peace, love, and non-violence. This could create a tension between embracing peaceful methods and understanding the necessity of struggle in spiritual matters.