Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse warns against judging others, while Matthew 12:41 implies judgment on the current generation by comparing it to the people of Nineveh.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 5:22
Here, judgment is attributed solely to the Son, conflicting with Matthew 12:41, where the Ninevites' role in judgment is highlighted.
John 5:22: For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
It states that every person who judges is condemning themselves, contrasting with Matthew 12:41, where the Ninevites are seen as justified in their judgement.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Contradiction with Romans 14:10
Advises against judging a brother, differing from Matthew 12:41, which presents the Ninevites as active judges against the generation.
Romans 14:10: But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
Contradiction with James 4:12
Indicates that there is one lawgiver who can save and destroy, contrasting with the role of the Ninevites as judges in Matthew 12:41.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction in the way the verse compares the people of Nineveh's response to Jonah with the response to Jesus. They may wonder why a greater response wasn’t expected for someone greater than Jonah. Others might question why judgment is being passed if forgiveness is a key teaching. Still, the interpretations and teachings can vary.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in the verse might be seen as comparing the repentance of outsiders (like the people of Nineveh) favorably over the current generation, suggesting external groups can sometimes better recognize and respond to truth than the insiders or chosen ones. This could be seen as inconsistent with the belief that those who are already part of the faith community should naturally be more receptive to its teachings.