Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes that there is no difference between Jew and Gentile in Christ, whereas Matthew 15:26 implies a distinction between Jews and Gentiles.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
This passage reveals that God shows no partiality and accepts people from every nation, which contradicts the implication of exclusivity in Matthew 15:26.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Romans 10:12
This verse states that there is no difference between Jew and Greek, contradicting the exclusivity suggested in Matthew 15:26.
Romans 10:12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse declares that God's offer of salvation is for the whole world, contrasting with the limited offer implied in Matthew 15:26.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
The passage points out that there is neither Greek nor Jew, highlighting unity that contradicts the division implied in Matthew 15:26.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14
This verse explains that Jesus has broken down the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles, opposing the division suggested in Matthew 15:26.
Ephesians 2:14: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Paradox #1
The story where this verse is found might seem to show Jesus as dismissive or harsh to non-Jews at first. This could seem inconsistent with the overall message of love and acceptance in the Bible. However, many interpret this passage as a test of faith, or as a broader message about faith's role in God's plan for all people. Different interpretations try to resolve this apparent contradiction.
Paradox #2
Some people might think there's a conflict because this verse can seem exclusive or harsh. It appears to prioritize one group over another, which might not align with the messages of love and inclusivity found elsewhere in the Bible. This could be seen as inconsistent with teachings about caring for all people equally.
Paradox #3
One potential issue with this verse is the perception of cultural and ethnic tension. Jesus' response can be seen as dismissive to non-Jewish (Gentile) people, which some readers find troubling or inconsistent with His usual message of love and acceptance for all. This can appear to conflict with the later teachings of inclusivity in Christianity.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in this verse might be seen in how it appears to compare helping people to giving food to dogs, which could be viewed as disrespectful or unkind. It raises questions about fairness and compassion in treating everyone with respect and care.