Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states that he did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it, which contrasts with Matthew 15:3 where he challenges the traditions around the law.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
Paul affirms the law by stating that faith establishes the law, potentially conflicting with the implication in Matthew 15:3 that tradition might void it.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24
It explains that the law was our "schoolmaster" to bring us unto Christ, which contrasts with the idea of setting aside traditions seen in Matthew 15:3.
Galatians 3:24: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with James 2:10
Emphasizes the importance of adhering to the entire law, while Matthew 15:3 suggests human traditions can negate the commandments of God.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Contradiction with Acts 6:13
It mentions how false witnesses accused Stephen of speaking against the law, ironically contrasting with Matthew 15:3 where Jesus seems to criticize misuse of the law.
Acts 6:13: And set up false witnesses, which said, This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the law:
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Matthew 15:3 could be seen in the challenge it raises to traditional religious rules versus God's commandments. Jesus points out that some human traditions might contradict or override God's true commands, implying that following human-made rules should not come before following divine laws. This could lead to conflicts between adhering to established traditions and prioritizing direct biblical teachings.
Paradox #2
Matthew 15:3 presents a situation where Jesus questions why people break God's commands for the sake of tradition. The contradiction could be seen when religious traditions or human rules are prioritized over direct divine commands. This can lead to inconsistency because it suggests that man-made practices sometimes overshadow what God has instructed, which might confuse what should be more important—tradition or divine law.