Contradictions and Paradoxes in Matthew 16:21

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Matthew 16:21 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Matthew 16:21. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Matthew, Jesus started to tell his friends that he needed to go to a big city where he would have to face a lot of pain from important leaders, but after being killed, he would become alive again three days later. This teaching helped his friends know what was going to happen and that it was part of a big plan.

Matthew 16:21: From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21

This verse states that many are the plans in a man's heart, but it is the Lord's purpose that prevails, suggesting a broader divine plan that might encompass but not necessarily align with specific foretellings.

Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.

Contradiction with John 10:18

This verse suggests that Jesus lays down his life willingly and has the authority to take it up again, which could be seen as contradicting the idea of an inevitable suffering imposed on Him.

John 10:18: No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

Contradiction with Matthew 26:53-54

These verses imply that Jesus had the option to avoid suffering but chose to fulfill the scriptures, contrasting the idea of an unavoidable path to death.

Matthew 26:53-54: But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?

Contradiction with Luke 22:42

This verse depicts Jesus expressing a potential divergence from the path of suffering if it aligns with God's will, suggesting a possibility for a different outcome than mentioned in Matthew 16:21.

Luke 22:42: Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. [willing, remove: Gr. willing to remove]

Contradiction with Acts 2:24

This verse speaks to God raising Jesus from the dead, freeing him from death, indicating a divinely planned victory over death that might contrast with the focus on only His suffering and death in Matthew 16:21.

Acts 2:24: Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.

Contradiction with Hebrews 5:8

This verse mentions that although Jesus was a son, he learned obedience through what he suffered, potentially suggesting the purpose of suffering as educational rather than predestined.

Hebrews 5:8: Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

Paradox #1

Some people see a potential conflict in this verse because it could clash with the disciples' understanding and expectations of Jesus as the Messiah. They may have expected a triumphant, earthly king, not one who would suffer and die. This idea of a suffering Messiah was difficult for them to reconcile with their beliefs.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.