Contradictions and Paradoxes in Matthew 16:22

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Matthew 16:22 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Matthew 16:22. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Matthew, Peter did not want Jesus to talk about sad things happening to him, so he told Jesus that those things should never happen. Peter cared a lot about Jesus and wanted to protect him from anything bad.

Matthew 16:22: Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. [Be...: Gr. Pity thyself]

Contradiction with Matthew 16:23

Jesus rebukes Peter, calling him "Satan," which contradicts Peter's misunderstanding in Matthew 16:22.

Matthew 16:23: But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 2:8

The verse states that the rulers didn't understand God's wisdom, contradicting Peter's presumptive rebuke in Matthew 16:22.

1 Corinthians 2:8: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known [it], they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.

Contradiction with John 18:11

Jesus tells Peter to put away his sword, which contradicts Peter's protective desire in Matthew 16:22.

John 18:11: Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?

Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9

God's thoughts and ways are different than man's, contradicting Peter’s human reaction in Matthew 16:22.

Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.

Contradiction with Matthew 16:24

Jesus speaks about taking up the cross, contradicting Peter's reluctance to accept suffering in Matthew 16:22.

Matthew 16:24: Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any [man] will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

Paradox #1

In Matthew 16:22, Peter rebukes Jesus for speaking about his upcoming suffering and death. The potential theological conflict here is that Peter, a disciple, is contradicting Jesus' mission and God's plan for salvation. This shows a lack of understanding of Jesus' purpose, despite being one of his closest followers.

Paradox #2

Peter's reaction in Matthew 16:22 can seem contradictory because he's arguing against Jesus' prediction of suffering, which is central to the Christian belief in Jesus' mission. On one hand, Peter seems to care for Jesus' well-being, but on the other hand, he misunderstands the necessity of Jesus' sacrifice, creating a conflict between human concern and divine purpose.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.