Contradiction with John 15:5
This verse emphasizes that apart from Jesus, one can do nothing, suggesting a limitation on human authority, contrasting with Matthew 18:18's assertion of binding and loosing power.
John 15:5: I am the vine, ye [are] the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. [without me: or, severed from me]
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
This verse indicates that a man's heart plans his way, but the Lord directs his steps, implying divine control over decisions, which contrasts with the authority given in Matthew 18:18.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Contradiction with James 4:15
This verse encourages saying "If the Lord will" when making plans, emphasizing submission to God's will above human authority, which contrasts with the seemingly autonomous authority implied in Matthew 18:18.
James 4:15: For that ye [ought] to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that.
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
These verses stress that God's thoughts and ways are higher than ours, highlighting human limitations in decision-making, which contrasts with the authority suggested in Matthew 18:18.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
This verse asserts that despite many plans in a person's heart, it is the Lord's purpose that prevails, suggesting a limit to human authority, opposing the autonomy of Matthew 18:18.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Paradox #1
Some people see a potential contradiction in this verse when compared to other parts of the Bible regarding authority. It suggests that human actions can dictate divine will, which some argue conflicts with the belief that only God has ultimate authority. Additionally, it might seem inconsistent with the notion of divine omniscience and the idea that God's plans are predetermined and unchangeable, leading to questions about how human decisions can influence heavenly outcomes.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction between this verse and the idea that God alone can make final decisions about right and wrong. The verse could seem to give humans a lot of power over spiritual matters, which may conflict with the belief that only God has that authority. However, others argue that this power is given by God and should align with God's will.
Paradox #3
One contradiction could be the difference in how authority and power are perceived and exercised in the early Church compared to other parts of the Bible. Some might argue that the verse suggests a level of authority given to the apostles that appears to conflict with the more centralized authority often associated with church leadership later in history. Inconsistencies could also arise when comparing this to differing interpretations across denominations on church authority and decision-making.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in Matthew 18:18 could be that it gives humans the power to make binding decisions on earth that are also considered binding in heaven. This concept might conflict with the belief in divine authority being solely in God's hands. It raises questions about the extent of human authority versus divine will.