Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
Unlike Matthew 19:9, this verse expands the circumstances under which a divorced woman can remarry and does not specify fornication as the sole exception for divorce.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with Mark 10:11-12
Contradicts by stating that remarriage after any divorce results in adultery, without mentioning any exception like fornication.
Mark 10:11-12: And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
Contradiction with Luke 16:18
This verse similarly contradicts by declaring that anyone who divorces and remarries commits adultery, without any specified exceptions.
Luke 16:18: Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from [her] husband committeth adultery.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11
Contradicts by advising separated spouses to remain unmarried or reconcile, with no allowance for remarriage even in cases of fornication.
1 Corinthians 7:10-11: And unto the married I command, [yet] not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from [her] husband:
Paradox #1
There may be a perceived conflict in Matthew 19:9 regarding divorce and remarriage. Some people see inconsistency between this verse and other biblical teachings on marriage, such as those in the Old Testament where divorce is allowed under certain circumstances, or the stricter view of marriage permanence emphasized by Jesus in other parts of the Gospels. These differences can lead to debates about the interpretation and application of divorce rules in various religious contexts.
Paradox #2
Matthew 19:9 could be seen as conflicting with other biblical teachings on marriage and divorce. In some parts of the Bible, marriage is portrayed as a permanent union, and divorce is discouraged. However, this verse suggests there are specific circumstances under which divorce and remarriage are permissible, which might seem inconsistent with the broader message that marriage should be lifelong.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with Matthew 19:9 comes from differing interpretations of divorce in the Bible. While this verse allows divorce under certain circumstances, other passages, like 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, appear to discourage it entirely, creating confusion about when divorce is acceptable.
Paradox #4
Matthew 19:9 might be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency because it addresses divorce and adultery in a way that seems different from other teachings in the Bible. In this verse, Jesus allows an exception for divorce, which some people might find conflicting with the overall message of forgiveness and commitment in marriage seen elsewhere. This can lead to differing interpretations and debates about the conditions under which divorce is acceptable, creating potential confusion or inconsistency in understanding moral teachings about marriage.