Contradictions and Paradoxes in Matthew 1:7

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Matthew 1:7 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Matthew 1:7. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Matthew, this verse tells us about Solomon, who had a son named Roboam, and Roboam had a son named Abia, and Abia had a son named Asa. It is part of a long list showing Jesus’s family tree.

Matthew 1:7: And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;

Contradiction with 1 Kings 4:31

In Matthew 1:7, Solomon's lineage is detailed, while in 1 Kings 4:31, Solomon's wisdom is praised above others, without mentioning his lineage.

1 Kings 4:31: For he was wiser than all men; than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Chalcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol: and his fame was in all nations round about.

Paradox #1

Matthew 1:7 is part of the genealogy of Jesus, and lists Solomon as a descendant of David. A potential inconsistency arises when comparing this genealogy to other genealogical records in the Bible, like the one in Luke 3, which does not mention Solomon and instead lists Nathan as the son of David. This difference can raise questions about the accuracy or purpose of the genealogies.

Paradox #2

The contradiction in Matthew 1:7 involves the genealogy listed there. This verse names Rehoboam as the father of Abijah and then lists Asa as the son of Abijah. However, other ancient texts and genealogical accounts, such as those in the Old Testament, suggest a different sequence and parentage for these figures, leading to debates about the accuracy of this lineup.

Paradox #3

The possible contradiction in Matthew 1:7 is about the genealogy of Jesus, specifically naming Solomon as the son of David. Some accounts or interpretations might show differences in names or lineages when compared to other genealogies, like those in Chronicles. Different translations or traditions may also influence these discrepancies.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.