Contradiction with Genesis 22:18
While Matthew 21:43 suggests the kingdom will be given to others, Genesis 22:18 promises blessings through Abraham's seed, indicating an original chosen lineage.
Genesis 22:18: And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
Contradiction with Exodus 19:5-6
God declares Israel as a treasured possession and a kingdom of priests, which suggests a permanent chosen status, conflicting with the idea of giving the kingdom to others.
Exodus 19:5-6: Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth [is] mine:
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 7:12-16
God's promise to David about establishing his kingdom forever suggests a continuity with Israel, in contrast to transferring the kingdom elsewhere.
2 Samuel 7:12-16: And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:35-37
These verses speak of the enduring nature of Israel before God, contradicting any notion of their kingdom being taken away.
Jeremiah 31:35-37: Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, [and] the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts [is] his name:
Contradiction with Romans 11:1-2
Paul affirms that God has not cast away His people, Israel, suggesting they retain their place in God's kingdom plan.
Romans 11:1-2: I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:10
This verse reiterates a new covenant with the house of Israel, indicating a continuing relationship rather than a transfer of kingdom rights.
Hebrews 8:10: For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: [put: Gr. give] [in: or, upon]
Paradox #1
Matthew 21:43 might be seen as a contradiction or conflict in how it appears to shift the focus of God's promises and blessings from the Jewish people to others, which could be interpreted as conflicting with earlier biblical promises about the special status of Israel. Some might perceive this as inconsistent with the idea of an unchanging covenant between God and the Jewish people.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Matthew 21:43 could relate to the idea of God's chosen people. Traditionally, Israelites were considered God's chosen ones. This verse suggests the kingdom of God can be taken away from them and given to others who produce its fruits, which might seem inconsistent with the idea of an unchanging chosen status. The conflict arises around who inherits the promises made to Israel and how God's plan is inclusive of others who follow His will.
Paradox #3
Matthew 21:43 could be seen as morally conflicting because it suggests that the kingdom of God will be taken away from one group and given to another. Some might view this as contradicting the idea of God's unconditional love and fairness, as it implies exclusion and a transfer of privileges based on actions or faithfulness. This could raise questions about justice and equity in the context of divine love.