Contradiction with John 1:49
In John 1:49, Nathanael acknowledges Jesus as the Son of God, implying a divine nature, contradicting Matthew 22:42 where Jesus asks whose son the Christ is, suggesting a human lineage.
John 1:49: Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.
Contradiction with Acts 2:36
In Acts 2:36, Peter proclaims Jesus as both Lord and Christ, suggesting a divine authority, which contrasts with Matthew 22:42 where the question focuses on earthly lineage as the son of David.
Acts 2:36: Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
Contradiction with Romans 1:4
Romans 1:4 states that Jesus was declared the Son of God with power, emphasizing his divine nature, which seems at odds with Matthew 22:42 that discusses the Messiah's human genealogy as the son of David.
Romans 1:4: And declared [to be] the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: [declared: Gr. determined]
Contradiction with Hebrews 1:5
Hebrews 1:5 emphasizes Jesus’ divine sonship, suggesting a unique, heavenly identity, contrasting with the earthly lineage discussed in Matthew 22:42 regarding being the son of David.
Hebrews 1:5: For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
Paradox #1
The doctrinal issue related to Matthew 22:42 is about Jesus's identity as the Messiah and the Son of David. Some Jewish expectations were that the Messiah would be a political leader or king, strictly a descendant of David. However, Jesus questions this expectation, suggesting a more spiritual role for the Messiah, as the Lord and not just a descendant. This can seem inconsistent with some Jewish interpretations of the Old Testament about the Messiah's role and lineage.