Contradiction with John 3:17
This verse states that God sent Jesus not to condemn the world but to save it, whereas Matthew 23:33 condemns the scribes and Pharisees as being destined for hell.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Romans 5:8
This verse emphasizes God's love in sending Christ to die for sinners, implying redemption, in contrast to the judgment pronounced in Matthew 23:33.
Romans 5:8: But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse suggests God is patient and does not want anyone to perish, which contradicts the declaration of damnation in Matthew 23:33.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 33:11
This verse expresses God's desire for the wicked to turn from their ways and live, contrasting with the condemnation in Matthew 23:33.
Ezekiel 33:11: Say unto them, [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Contradiction with Luke 19:10
This verse highlights Jesus' mission to seek and save the lost, differing from the harsh rebuke found in Matthew 23:33.
Luke 19:10: For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse portrays mercy triumphing over judgment, opposing the severe tone of judgment in Matthew 23:33.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
This verse indicates God's desire for all to be saved and know the truth, conflicting with the inevitable judgment in Matthew 23:33.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Paradox #1
The potential doctrinal conflict with Matthew 23:33 might be related to the harsh language it uses, which can seem inconsistent with Christian teachings about love, forgiveness, and mercy. While the verse is direct and severe, particularly in condemning certain behaviors, this might appear to conflict with the broader message of grace and redemption given elsewhere in the Bible. However, it's often understood that the strong language is specific to the context and audience it addresses.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency in Matthew 23:33 might arise when comparing the portrayal of religious leaders in the New Testament with other historical accounts. In the New Testament, religious leaders are often depicted negatively, which might conflict with historical records that show these leaders in a more positive or neutral light. Such contrasts can lead to debates about the perspective and bias of biblical texts.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this context could arise from the harshness of the language used against certain people, which might seem inconsistent with the teachings of love and forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible. This could raise questions about reconciling harsh judgment with compassionate teachings.