Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17
This verse suggests that believers will meet the Lord in the air, implying a unification in the clouds rather than angels gathering elect from different earthly locations.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17: For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
Contradiction with 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
This verse indicates that certain events, such as the apostasy and revealing of the man of sin, must occur before the gathering, which might contradict the immediacy or timeline presented in Matthew 24:31.
2 Thessalonians 2:1-3: Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and [by] our gathering together unto him, [unto him: or, around him]
Contradiction with John 5:28-29
It describes a resurrection for both the righteous and the wicked, rather than focusing solely on the gathering of the elect, suggesting a wider scope.
John 5:28-29: Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction between this verse and other parts of the Bible that suggest only God knows the final timing or that judgement and gathering should only be God's task. This might raise questions about the roles of angels and humans in the end times as described in different parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
Scholars often debate how this verse aligns with historical events and timelines, such as whether it refers to a past, present, or future event. Some argue it describes future events that have not yet occurred, while others believe it has already been fulfilled in history, leading to differing interpretations and understandings. This can cause inconsistency in explaining its actual historical context.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in the context of Matthew 24:31 could be the idea of selective salvation or the gathering of the "chosen" ones. This could be seen as conflicting with the notion of universal love and equality, suggesting a preferential treatment or exclusion of some people based on certain criteria. Such interpretations might seem at odds with the broader message of love and inclusivity found in other parts of the Bible.