Contradiction with Matthew 6:20
This verse emphasizes storing treasures in heaven instead of earthly possessions, which contrasts with the notion of accepting the perpetual presence of the poor.
Matthew 6:20: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
Contradiction with Luke 6:20
This verse suggests a blessing for the poor, implying that poverty is not a permanent state but will be relieved, differing from the acceptance of the poor's continual existence.
Luke 6:20: And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said, Blessed [be ye] poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.
Contradiction with Acts 4:34-35
This passage describes a time when there were no needy among the believers due to sharing of resources, contradicting the notion that the poor will always be present.
Acts 4:34-35: Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:17
This verse indicates that helping the poor brings rewards from God, which challenges accepting their constant presence without intervention.
Proverbs 19:17: He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the LORD; and that which he hath given will he pay him again. [that which...: or, his deed]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:4
This verse states that there should be no poor among the Israelites, contradicting the idea that poverty is an unchangeable condition.
Deuteronomy 15:4: Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance to possess it: [Save...: or, To the end that there be no poor among you]
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction with the message of helping the poor. In one part of the Bible, Jesus emphasizes the importance of caring for the needy. However, in this verse, it might seem like there's a suggestion to prioritize other actions over helping the poor at that moment. This can seem inconsistent with the broader message about compassion and charity for those in need.
Paradox #2
One possible inconsistency with Matthew 26:11 is the idea that Jesus acknowledges the presence of the poor as a constant, yet in other parts of the Bible, followers are encouraged to help the poor and work towards alleviating their struggles. This could seem contradictory, as it suggests both the inevitability of poverty and the call to address it.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction in Matthew 26:11 is that it may seem to contrast with other teachings of Jesus about caring for the poor. While this verse suggests that poverty is a constant issue, which could imply less urgency in addressing it, other teachings emphasize actively helping those in need. This could create a tension between focusing on spiritual matters versus immediate social action.