Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:21
Ezekiel 18:21 states that if a wicked person turns away from their sins, they will live, implying redemption is possible, whereas Matthew 26:24 condemns Judas to a fate where non-existence would be preferable.
Ezekiel 18:21: But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
2 Peter 3:9 highlights God's patience and His desire for all to come to repentance, contrasting with the irreversible judgment implied in Matthew 26:24.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with John 6:37
John 6:37 assures that whoever comes to Jesus will not be cast out, contradicting the sense of inevitable doom for Judas as portrayed in Matthew 26:24.
John 6:37: All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
Contradiction with Romans 8:1
Romans 8:1 states there is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus, contradicting the severe judgment implied for Judas in Matthew 26:24.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
1 Timothy 2:4 states God wants all men to be saved, which contrasts with the condemnation expressed in Matthew 26:24 for Judas.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 18:8
Jeremiah 18:8 suggests a possibility of relenting from punishment if a nation repents, while Matthew 26:24 suggests an absolute fate for Judas.
Jeremiah 18:8: If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Matthew 26:24 could involve the tension between divine foreknowledge and human responsibility. The verse implies that Jesus' betrayal was foreseen and part of a divine plan, yet Judas is still held accountable for his actions. This raises questions about free will and whether Judas had a choice in his betrayal, highlighting a complex interaction between predestination and moral responsibility.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict with this verse might stem from the tension between fate and free will. It suggests a predetermined path for a person, which raises questions about personal responsibility if their actions are already destined. This can conflict with the idea of moral accountability, where individuals are expected to choose right from wrong.