Contradiction with Romans 7:15
This verse expresses the struggle between the desire to do good and the inability to carry it out, contradicting the idea of overcoming temptation by mere watchfulness and prayer.
Romans 7:15: For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. [allow: Gr. know]
Contradiction with James 1:14-15
It emphasizes that temptation comes from one's own desires, suggesting a different source of temptation contrary to the external watchfulness advocated in Matthew 26:41.
James 1:14-15: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:13
This verse assures that God will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you can bear, which contrasts with the emphasis in Matthew 26:41 on human vigilance and prayer to avoid falling into temptation.
1 Corinthians 10:13: There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God [is] faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear [it]. [common...: or, moderate]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:17
It describes the flesh and Spirit being in opposition, a more inherent conflict compared to the external vigilance suggested in Matthew 26:41.
Galatians 5:17: For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
Contradiction with Genesis 6:5
It states that every imagination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil continually, suggesting a more pervasive sinfulness than what individual vigilance and prayer could overcome.
Genesis 6:5: And GOD saw that the wickedness of man [was] great in the earth, and [that] every imagination of the thoughts of his heart [was] only evil continually. [every...: or, the whole imagination: the Hebrew word signifieth not only the imagination, but also the purposes and desires] [continually: Heb. every day]
Paradox #1
Some people might see a possible inconsistency between the idea of needing to stay spiritually alert and the belief that God is in control of everything. If God is all-powerful and has a plan, then some might question why humans need to be vigilant and actively resist temptation, as it suggests human effort plays a role in spiritual matters.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could be in how the verse encourages people to stay spiritually vigilant while also highlighting human weakness. This might seem inconsistent because it acknowledges that even with the best intentions, people often fail to live up to their spiritual goals. The challenge is balancing being watchful and accepting human limitations.