Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse suggests turning the other cheek instead of resorting to violence, contradicting the act of using a sword in Matthew 26:51.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
The law of 'an eye for an eye' promotes retribution, which contrasts with the act of cutting off an ear in Matthew 26:51.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against taking personal revenge, conflicting with the act of violence in Matthew 26:51.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
These verses advocate for kindness to enemies, contradicting the hostile action in Matthew 26:51.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
This verse explicitly states that those who use the sword will perish by the sword, directly contradicting the use of the sword in verse 51.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Luke 6:27-29
These verses encourage loving enemies and offer the other cheek, opposing the action taken in Matthew 26:51.
Luke 6:27-29: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with James 1:20
This verse states that human anger does not produce the righteousness of God, contrasting with the violent reaction in Matthew 26:51.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in the verse could be the conflict between advocating for peace and non-violence, as Jesus often taught, and the disciple’s use of violence in trying to protect him. It highlights the inconsistency between the disciple’s actions and Jesus' message of love and forgiveness.