Contradiction with John 18:9
This verse states that none of the disciples were lost, fulfilling Jesus' earlier word, which contrasts with the abandonment described in Matthew 26:56.
John 18:9: That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.
Contradiction with John 16:32
This verse predicts the scattering of disciples but states that Jesus is not alone, in contrast to Matthew 26:56's depiction of complete desertion.
John 16:32: Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me. [his own: or, his own home]
Contradiction with Mark 14:50
The verse mirrors Matthew 26:56 with all disciples fleeing, yet the context emphasizes fulfillment differently, focusing more on the desertion aspect.
Mark 14:50: And they all forsook him, and fled.
Contradiction with Matthew 28:20
This verse promises Jesus is always with his followers, contrasting with the image of abandonment in Matthew 26:56.
Matthew 28:20: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in this context can arise when considering the theme of prophecy and free will. Some might argue that if events happen to fulfill prophecy, it raises questions about human free will and responsibility. If everything happened to fulfill what was predicted, then it could be seen as limiting personal choice. However, it's also understood that prophecy and free will can coexist in a way that doesn't negate human responsibility. Generally, this tension is more a matter of interpretation and does not pose a direct contradiction within the broader theological framework.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Matthew 26:56 could be the conflict between loyalty and prophecy. The disciples deserting Jesus might seem like a lack of loyalty or courage. However, it fulfills a prophecy, suggesting a tension between human actions and divine plans. This raises questions about free will versus destiny and how seemingly negative actions are part of a bigger divine purpose.