Contradiction with Acts 2:23
This verse indicates that Jesus' crucifixion was part of God's predetermined plan, which contrasts with the casting of lots in Matthew 27:35, suggesting randomness.
Acts 2:23: Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
Contradiction with Luke 23:34
This verse records Jesus asking for forgiveness for those who crucified him, which contradicts the indifference suggested by the soldiers casting lots as in Matthew 27:35.
Luke 23:34: Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.
Contradiction with John 19:23-24
It states that Jesus' garments were divided among the soldiers and they cast lots over his seamless robe, which might seem to align but contradicts the implication of fulfillment of prophecy being absent in Matthew 27:35.
John 19:23-24: Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also [his] coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. [woven: or, wrought]
Paradox #1
The verse describes the soldiers dividing Jesus' garments by casting lots. Some people see a contradiction because other accounts of this event in the different Gospels have slight variations in detail, like the exact wording or actions described. These differences might seem inconsistent to readers expecting identical accounts but can be understood as different perspectives on the same event.
Paradox #2
In Matthew 27:35, the event of the soldiers casting lots for Jesus' clothing is described. A potential contradiction involves the fulfillment of prophecy. The verse suggests this event fulfills Old Testament prophecy, specifically Psalm 22:18. However, some scholars debate the timing and method of this fulfillment, as well as inconsistencies in the Gospel accounts regarding the details of the crucifixion, noting variations in portrayal among the four Gospels.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction or conflict in Matthew 27:35 could be about the act of dividing someone's possessions while they are suffering or dying, which might not align with the principles of compassion and respect for human dignity. This action might seem insensitive or disrespectful, contrasting with teachings about treating others with kindness and empathy.