Contradiction with John 17:12
Matthew 27:4 indicates Judas's remorse for betraying "innocent blood," but John 17:12 describes his betrayal as destined, referring to him as the "son of perdition" who was lost according to the Scriptures.
John 17:12: While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.
Contradiction with Acts 1:18
Matthew 27:4 depicts Judas expressing regret for his actions, whereas Acts 1:18 describes him acquiring a field with the betrayal's "reward," suggesting a more materialistic ending rather than one of remorse.
Acts 1:18: Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:24
Matthew 27:4 communicates Judas's guilt and remorse, yet Matthew 26:24 acknowledges his betrayal as part of a divine plan, implying inevitability over personal repentance.
Matthew 26:24: The Son of man goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born.
Contradiction with John 13:27
Matthew 27:4 details Judas's confession of sin, while John 13:27 shows Jesus instructing Judas to carry out his betrayal quickly, portraying Judas's actions as part of God's purpose without hindrance.
John 13:27: And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Matthew 27:4 could be seen in the sense of regret and taking responsibility for one's actions versus the unforgiving consequences that follow. It highlights a conflict between feeling remorse and the inability to undo the harm done, emphasizing the complexity of guilt and redemption.