Contradiction with Matthew 27:37
Matthew 2:1 implies the birth of Jesus, while Matthew 27:37 describes the crucifixion, suggesting an end rather than a beginning.
Matthew 27:37: And set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
Contradiction with Luke 2:39
Matthew 2:1 describes Magi visiting the child Jesus, indicating a longer stay in Bethlehem, whereas Luke 2:39 suggests a quick return to Nazareth after the birth rituals.
Luke 2:39: And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.
Contradiction with John 1:46
Matthew 2:1 mentions Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus, while John 1:46 reflects skepticism about anything good, including the Messiah, coming from Nazareth, highlighting contrasting expectations.
John 1:46: And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.
Paradox #1
Some scholars point out a potential contradiction regarding the timing of the events described. The verse mentions the birth of Jesus during the reign of King Herod. However, historical records suggest that King Herod died in 4 BCE. This creates a possible inconsistency with the traditional dating of Jesus' birth, which some believe to be around 1-3 CE.