Contradiction with 1 Kings 8:13
States that God has a permanent dwelling place, whereas Matthew 2:13 implies God's guidance directs Joseph to take Jesus to Egypt, suggesting God's presence is not fixed.
1 Kings 8:13: I have surely built thee an house to dwell in, a settled place for thee to abide in for ever.
Contradiction with Isaiah 30:15
Emphasizes salvation through quietness and trust, but Matthew 2:13 shows salvation through active escape to Egypt.
Isaiah 30:15: For thus saith the Lord GOD, the Holy One of Israel; In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength: and ye would not.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 42:10
Advises against going to Egypt for safety, directly contrasting with the angel's instruction in Matthew 2:13.
Jeremiah 42:10: If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull [you] down, and I will plant you, and not pluck [you] up: for I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.
Contradiction with Acts 1:4
The apostles are told to stay in Jerusalem, opposite to Joseph's instructed flight from his current place in Matthew 2:13.
Acts 1:4: And, being assembled together with [them], commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, [saith he], ye have heard of me. [being...: or, eating together]
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5-6
Encourages trusting in the Lord rather than relying on personal understanding, while Matthew 2:13 involves Joseph acting on an angelic dream, which could be seen as a proactive measure.
Proverbs 3:5-6: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Numbers 14:42
Warns against leaving a place without God’s presence, yet Matthew 2:13 involves leaving due to God’s directive through an angel.
Numbers 14:42: Go not up, for the LORD [is] not among you; that ye be not smitten before your enemies.
Paradox #1
This verse might raise questions about the idea of divine intervention and protection. While divine guidance helps one family escape danger, it raises the question of why similar protection isn't extended to all vulnerable individuals in perilous situations, leading to a potential inconsistency in the distribution of divine aid.