Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Suggests the old covenant is obsolete, which contrasts the notion of the law's enduring validity in Matthew 5:18.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Indicates that the law was a guardian until Christ, implying it no longer applies, which contradicts the idea of permanence in Matthew 5:18.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
States that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness, which conflicts with the enduring nature of the law suggested in Matthew 5:18.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
Suggests that Christ wiped out the written code, which opposes the idea that not one jot or tittle would pass from the law.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction between this verse and other parts of the New Testament that suggest followers of Jesus are not bound by all Old Testament laws. The idea is that Jesus fulfilled these laws, and some believe this means certain laws changed. The verse could be seen as suggesting all laws remain unchanged.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction between this verse and passages that suggest the law is no longer binding, as in various New Testament teachings that emphasize faith over law. There is also debate on how the details of the law apply to Christians today, leading to questions about consistency.
Paradox #3
One possible historical conflict with this verse could be related to the notion of the eternal nature of the law, which might contradict the changes in Old Testament laws seen in later Christian teachings. For example, some Christian denominations believe that certain Old Testament laws were fulfilled or no longer applicable after Jesus's teachings and sacrificial death, leading to a debate on the continuity and permanence of these laws.
Paradox #4
Some people might see a conflict between the idea that every part of the law is important and Jesus' later teachings or actions that seem to change or even break some old rules. They might wonder how these fit together.