Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
This verse introduces the principle of "an eye for an eye," which contradicts the proactive kindness advocated in Matthew 7:12.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:19-20
Similar to Exodus 21:24, it upholds a retributive justice approach, conflicting with the concept of treating others kindly first.
Leviticus 24:19-20: And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 19:21
Again supports a literal retributive justice system, which is contrary to the preemptive goodness encouraged in Matthew 7:12.
Deuteronomy 19:21: And thine eye shall not pity; [but] life [shall go] for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Contradiction with Luke 14:26
This verse's discussion on hating family for discipleship purposes appears to conflict with treating others well as advised by Matthew 7:12.
Luke 14:26: If any [man] come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Paradox #1
Matthew 7:12 is often summarized as the "Golden Rule," which encourages treating others as you wish to be treated. A possible contradiction or inconsistency might arise when this principle is applied universally without considering cultural differences or personal boundaries. For example, what one person sees as kind or fair treatment may not be perceived the same way by someone else due to differing values or social norms. This can lead to conflicts if the rule is applied without sensitivity to individual or cultural differences.