Contradiction with Matthew 6:26
Explains how God provides for the birds of the air, suggesting His care and provision, contrasting with the notion of having 'nowhere to lay his head'.
Matthew 6:26: Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Contradiction with Matthew 27:57-60
Describes Joseph of Arimathea providing a tomb for Jesus, indicating He had a place to rest.
Matthew 27:57-60: When the even was come, there came a rich man of Arimathaea, named Joseph, who also himself was Jesus' disciple:
Contradiction with Luke 9:58
Repeats the same statement as Matthew 8:20 but is still considered a contradiction within context as other verses suggest provision and care.
Luke 9:58: And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air [have] nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay [his] head.
Contradiction with John 19:41-42
Mentions Jesus's burial in a new tomb, indicating He had a place of rest in death.
John 19:41-42: Now in the place where he was crucified there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:24
Talks about lying down and not being afraid, suggesting security in rest, contrasting with having no fixed abode.
Proverbs 3:24: When thou liest down, thou shalt not be afraid: yea, thou shalt lie down, and thy sleep shall be sweet.
Paradox #1
The verse suggests that Jesus didn't have a permanent home, which might seem contradictory because, as the Son of God, some might expect Him to have more comfort or stability. However, this demonstrates His humility and focus on spiritual rather than material wealth. Any perceived contradiction is often resolved by understanding the broader message about prioritizing spiritual over earthly matters.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Matthew 8:20 could relate to the portrayal of Jesus' divinity and authority. Some might argue there's a conflict between Jesus having divine status and yet lacking basic human comforts. However, this reflects his choice to live humbly rather than being a contradiction in doctrines. Overall, this doesn't pose a significant contradiction in understanding Jesus' role and mission.
Paradox #3
The possible contradiction in the verse is about Jesus, who is often regarded as a king or leader, not having a home, which contrasts with the expectation that leaders should have comfort and stability. This raises questions about the nature of leadership and what is truly necessary to be a leader.