Contradiction with Isaiah 2:2
This verse speaks of the mountain of the Lord's house being established and exalted, which contrasts with the prediction of Zion's desolation in Micah 3:12.
Isaiah 2:2: And it shall come to pass in the last days, [that] the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. [established: or, prepared]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 33:6-9
These verses promise restoration and rebuilding of Jerusalem, contradicting Micah 3:12's prophecy of destruction and ruin.
Jeremiah 33:6-9: Behold, I will bring it health and cure, and I will cure them, and will reveal unto them the abundance of peace and truth.
Contradiction with Zechariah 8:3
This verse describes the Lord returning to Zion and dwelling in Jerusalem, signifying a period of peace and truth, which opposes the desolation prophesied in Micah 3:12.
Zechariah 8:3: Thus saith the LORD; I am returned unto Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem: and Jerusalem shall be called a city of truth; and the mountain of the LORD of hosts the holy mountain.
Contradiction with Psalm 87:2-3
These verses speak of God's love for the gates of Zion and glorious things being spoken of the city, contrasting with the devastation mentioned in Micah 3:12.
Psalm 87:2-3: The LORD loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 36:35
This verse promises that the land will become like the Garden of Eden, contradicting the complete destruction and barrenness depicted in Micah 3:12.
Ezekiel 36:35: And they shall say, This land that was desolate is become like the garden of Eden; and the waste and desolate and ruined cities [are become] fenced, [and] are inhabited.
Paradox #1
Micah 3:12 predicts that Jerusalem would be destroyed because of the leaders' sins. A contradiction or conflict may arise because some historical records suggest that Jerusalem was eventually rebuilt and became a significant city again. This might seem inconsistent with the idea of total destruction or lasting consequences. However, many interpret this warning as a conditional prophecy based on the people's choices, which eventually led to their return and rebuilding efforts.
Paradox #2
Micah 3:12 predicts destruction as a consequence for the people's actions. The moral conflict might be that while the verse emphasizes divine justice, it could seem harsh or unforgiving, especially if it doesn't highlight the possibility of mercy or redemption for those who repent. People might struggle with reconciling the idea of a loving deity with the severe punishments described.