Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Nehemiah 10:35 talks about bringing offerings as per the Old Covenant, while Matthew 5:17 speaks of Jesus fulfilling the law, which can be interpreted as a shift from Old Covenant practices.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
Nehemiah 10:35 pertains to the practice of bringing offerings, but Hebrews 10:1 describes the law, including its offerings, as a shadow of things to come, implying a move away from such physical practices.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:23-25
Nehemiah 10:35 emphasizes following the law with offerings, whereas Galatians 3:23-25 explains that faith in Christ has replaced the need for adherence to the old law.
Galatians 3:23-25: But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Nehemiah 10:35 mandates certain observances, yet Colossians 2:16-17 suggests that such religious practices are not to be judged in the new faith.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with John 4:23-24
Nehemiah 10:35 highlights specific offerings as worship, but John 4:23-24 indicates worship is now in spirit and truth, not bound to ritual acts.
John 4:23-24: But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
Contradiction with Romans 14:5-6
Nehemiah 10:35 involves specific time-bound offerings, whereas Romans 14:5-6 suggests individual freedom in religious observation days.
Romans 14:5-6: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with Acts 15:28-29
Nehemiah 10:35 reflects the Jewish law's demands of offerings, unlike Acts 15:28-29 where Gentile believers are not required to follow these Jewish laws.
Acts 15:28-29: For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-15
Nehemiah 10:35 is based on following traditional laws, while Ephesians 2:14-15 states that Christ abolished the law of commandments contained in ordinances.
Ephesians 2:14-15: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Nehemiah 10:35 stresses adherence to dietary laws for offerings, but Mark 7:18-19 implies all foods are clean, contrasting these traditional laws.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?