Contradictions and Paradoxes in Nehemiah 13:23

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Nehemiah 13:23 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Nehemiah 13:23. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book, Nehemiah was worried because the Jewish people were marrying wives from other places who didn't know about or follow God's teachings. He wanted everyone to stay true to their faith and not be influenced by different beliefs.

Nehemiah 13:23: In those days also saw I Jews [that] had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, [and] of Moab: [had...: Heb. had made to dwell with them]

Contradiction with Ruth 1:16

Ruth, a Moabite woman, is embraced by the Jewish community, contradicting the notion of excluding foreign spouses.

Ruth 1:16: And Ruth said, Intreat me not to leave thee, [or] to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people [shall be] my people, and thy God my God: [Intreat...: or, Be not against me]

Contradiction with Matthew 28:19

Jesus' command to make disciples of all nations suggests inclusivity, contrasting with opposition to foreign marriages.

Matthew 28:19: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: [teach...: or, make disciples, or, Christians of all nations]

Contradiction with Galatians 3:28

This verse emphasizes unity in Christ regardless of ethnic background, opposing segregation based on foreign marriages.

Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Contradiction with 1 Kings 11:1-3

King Solomon's many foreign wives are mentioned without direct condemnation, contrasting Nehemiah's negative view.

1 Kings 11:1-3: But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, [and] Hittites; [together...: or, beside]

Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35

Peter states that God shows no partiality among nations, which challenges the discouragement of foreign marital ties.

Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

Paradox #1

The conflict could arise from the idea that the verse suggests strict separation based on ethnicity, which might seem at odds with other biblical themes of inclusivity and love for all people, such as those found in the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament.

Paradox #2

Nehemiah 13:23 mentions Jewish men marrying foreign women, which could be seen as contradictory to earlier biblical texts that acknowledge and even celebrate marriages with foreign individuals, like that of Ruth and Boaz. This inconsistency could point to differing attitudes toward intermarriage over time in the biblical narrative.

Paradox #3

Nehemiah 13:23 might raise contradictions or conflicts because it discusses the issue of intermarriage between Israelites and foreign women. The moral conflict could arise in today's context regarding views on racial and cultural integration versus the preservation of cultural or religious identity. Some may see the restriction as conflicting with modern values of acceptance and inclusivity.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.