Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Jesus instructs to resist not evil and turn the other cheek, contrasting Nehemiah's physical enforcement.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27-28
Jesus tells us to love our enemies and bless those who curse, differing from Nehemiah's actions of cursing and smiting.
Luke 6:27-28: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
A soft answer is encouraged to turn away wrath, contradicting Nehemiah's approach of contention.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with James 1:20
The wrath of man is said to not work the righteousness of God, challenging Nehemiah's anger-driven actions.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:31-32
Calls for kindness, tenderheartedness, and forgiveness, in contrast to Nehemiah's rebuke and punishment.
Ephesians 4:31-32: Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
Paradox #1
Nehemiah 13:25 can be seen to conflict with themes of love and forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible, as it involves actions that are harsh and punitive. This could seem inconsistent with teachings that emphasize patience and kindness.
Paradox #2
Nehemiah 13:25 could be seen as inconsistent with New Testament teachings about love and forgiveness, particularly teachings about turning the other cheek and loving one's enemies, as it involves harsh actions and reprimands. These contrasting approaches to dealing with conflict and sin might be seen as a contradiction.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Nehemiah 13:25 could be seen in the use of force or violence to enforce religious or cultural rules, which may conflict with teachings about love, forgiveness, and non-violence found elsewhere in religious texts.