Contradiction with Exodus 12:37
Numbers 11:21 expresses doubt about feeding 600,000 men, but Exodus 12:37 states that many left Egypt, implying God is capable of providing for large numbers.
Exodus 12:37: And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot [that were] men, beside children.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:26
Numbers 11:21 shows Moses questioning God's ability to provide meat for the Israelites, but Matthew 19:26 affirms that with God, all things are possible.
Matthew 19:26: But Jesus beheld [them], and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Contradiction with Job 42:2
Reflects belief in God’s omnipotence and ability to do anything, which contrasts with the doubt expressed in Numbers 11:21 about God’s provision.
Job 42:2: I know that thou canst do every [thing], and [that] no thought can be withholden from thee. [no thought can be...: or, no thought of thine can be hindered]
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
While Moses expresses doubt in Numbers 11:21, Isaiah 55:8-9 suggests that God's ways and thoughts are higher than humanity's, challenging Moses's skepticism.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This verse assures that God will supply all needs according to His riches, contrasting with Moses's doubt about God's provision for Israel in Numbers 11:21.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
Numbers 11:21 may appear inconsistent with the previous promises of God. In this verse, Moses expresses doubt about God's ability to provide meat for all the Israelites. This could seem contradictory because it contrasts with earlier instances where God demonstrated His power and provision for the Israelites. However, it can also be seen as highlighting Moses' human limitations and lack of faith.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction in that verse might relate to the large number of people mentioned and the logistics of sustaining them, such as providing sufficient food and resources, which could be scientifically challenging given the historical and environmental context.