Contradiction with John 6:35
Jesus declares Himself as the bread of life, satisfying all hunger, whereas in Numbers 11:5, the Israelites express longing for physical food like fish, cucumbers, and melons, implying they were not satisfied.
John 6:35: And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
Contradiction with Matthew 4:4
Jesus emphasizes living by every word of God rather than bread alone, contrasting the Israelites' craving for physical food in Numbers 11:5.
Matthew 4:4: But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:11-12
Paul speaks of being content in all circumstances, which contrasts with the discontentment expressed by the Israelites in Numbers 11:5.
Philippians 4:11-12: Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, [therewith] to be content.
Contradiction with Psalm 23:1
David declares that the Lord is his shepherd and he lacks nothing, which contrasts with the lack and desire for specific foods expressed by the Israelites in Numbers 11:5.
Psalm 23:1: [A Psalm of David.] The LORD [is] my shepherd; I shall not want.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
Believers are encouraged to be content with what they have, contradicting the Israelites' dissatisfaction and longing for food in Numbers 11:5.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:8
Suggests contentment with basic needs, contrasting the Israelites’ yearning for specific foods in Numbers 11:5 which shows discontent with what they had.
1 Timothy 6:8: And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.
Paradox #1
The mention in Numbers 11:5 of the Israelites recalling the free fish, cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions, and garlic they ate in Egypt can be seen as a contradiction with the hardship of their slavery. While they remember the good food, it conflicts with the broader biblical narrative of their suffering as slaves and the subsequent emphasis on their deliverance by God. This inconsistency highlights selective memory and ingratitude rather than appreciation for their freedom.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction with Numbers 11:5 could be seen in the context of God's provision and the Israelites' complaints. In this verse, the Israelites express a longing for the food they ate in Egypt, despite having been freed from slavery and being provided for by God with manna. This creates a contrast between human dissatisfaction and divine provision, questioning how people can desire their old life when God offers what they need. However, this is more of a thematic tension rather than a direct contradiction with a specific doctrine. Overall, these kinds of narratives typically aim to highlight human nature versus divine faithfulness.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding the content of Numbers 11:5 relates to the mention of Israelites recalling their past diet in Egypt, which includes items like fish, cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions, and garlic. The contradiction arises because the narrative suggests that the Israelites had access to a varied and abundant diet while living as slaves in Egypt. This seems inconsistent with the generally harsh conditions expected of slavery. Moreover, historical and archaeological evidence does not necessarily support the idea of such an abundance of food being consistently available to slaves in ancient Egypt.
Paradox #4
The potential scientific inconsistency in the specific context mentioned might relate to the Israelites' recollection of specific foods (like fish, cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions, and garlic) being consumed freely in Egypt. Historically and archaeologically, it is debated whether slaves or laborers in Egypt had such abundant access to these foods freely. This could be seen as a contrast with historical understandings of the diet of enslaved people during that time.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be viewed in how it reflects the Israelites' dissatisfaction with their current situation despite having been delivered from slavery. This highlights a struggle between gratitude for dramatic past deliverances and ingratitude for current hardships, which can be seen as a moral inconsistency in human nature.