Contradiction with Isaiah 55:11
This verse states that God's word always achieves what He desires, whereas Numbers 14:28 suggests that what people say will happen to them.
Isaiah 55:11: So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
It expresses that there are many plans in a man's heart, but only the Lord's counsel shall stand, differing from the notion of what a person verbalizes coming to pass.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Contradiction with James 4:15
Advises saying, "If the Lord wills, we shall live," emphasizing reliance on God's will, contrasting with Numbers 14:28 about personal declarations happening.
James 4:15: For that ye [ought] to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
God has plans for welfare, not for harm, which could contradict the idea that harmful outcomes come from one's own words as stated in Numbers 14:28.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with Matthew 12:36
Warns that every idle word spoken will be accounted for, implying words have consequences but based on judgment, which could contrast or complicate the direct consequence mentioned in Numbers 14:28.
Matthew 12:36: But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction in Numbers 14:28 with the concept of God's mercy and forgiveness. In this verse, God announces a harsh judgment on the Israelites due to their lack of faith. This may seem conflicting with instances where God is portrayed as forgiving and merciful, especially towards those who repent. However, theological interpretations often explain this by highlighting the balance between God's justice and mercy, suggesting that consequences for actions are part of divine justice, which is consistent with God's character in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
Some might see a contradiction in the idea of God changing His mind or intentions. At times, the Bible describes God as unchanging, yet there are verses where He appears to react differently based on human actions or prayers. This could seem inconsistent to some readers.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the idea of a punishing God versus a forgiving God. If God promises to forgive but also delivers harsh punishments, some might see this as inconsistent. The conflict arises when trying to reconcile a loving and merciful God with actions that seem harsh and unyielding.